Mrs Markleham
Categories
- Age discrimination (3)
- Disability (1)
- Discrimination (7)
- Equal pay (1)
- Equality Act (4)
- General employment law (5)
- Human Rights (3)
- Miscellany (3)
- Myths (5)
- Press hyperbole (5)
- Red Tape Challenge (4)
- Religion (5)
- Retirement (2)
- Sex discrimination (2)
- Sexual orientation (1)
- Uncategorized (1)
-
Recent Posts
@MrsMarkleham on Twitter
- BREAKING NEWS: Minister declines to make any comment on judge's sentencing decision ow.ly/h5x7D. (UK Government please take note.) 4 months ago
- @deannanewstex Thanks but my blog is just a hobby. I write when I want, people read it if they want. Why complicate things? 5 months ago
- RT @AdamWagner1: More! > Eweida and Others v. UK (Part I): Taking Freedom of Religion More Seriously - Strasbourg Observers http://t. ... 5 months ago
- @flipchartrick thanks for the mention! 5 months ago
- RT @Flipchartrick #Eweida victory is a significant extension of religious rights wp.me/p3uYA-1Hs 5 months ago
- But also, "nothing more than judicial approval of a wise concession made by BA long before litigation was contemplated" ow.ly/gTbo0 5 months ago
- #Eweida: a momentous decision. A few rambling thoughts from me. #ukemplaw. ow.ly/gRF69 5 months ago
- @ariadneassoc @DazNewman @ljanstis @pcsavage *confused face* 5 months ago
Tech stuff
Tag Archives: Telegraph
Woodcock: press reporting of employment law issues reaches a new low
It is hard to find a paragraph of the Telegraph’s report of Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust that is not hugely inaccurate, alarmist, and misleading. I should say now that the likely effect of this case on age discrimination or other areas of employment law is close to nil, and yet the Telegraph screams that the court has apparently sanctioned the sacking of older workers to save employers money “even though the practise is unlawful”. Continue reading
Posted in Age discrimination, Press hyperbole, Retirement
Tagged Discrimination, Employment Law, Telegraph, Woodcock
6 Comments