Mrs Markleham
Categories
- Age discrimination (3)
- Disability (1)
- Discrimination (7)
- Equal pay (1)
- Equality Act (4)
- General employment law (5)
- Human Rights (3)
- Miscellany (3)
- Myths (5)
- Press hyperbole (5)
- Red Tape Challenge (4)
- Religion (5)
- Retirement (2)
- Sex discrimination (2)
- Sexual orientation (1)
- Uncategorized (1)
-
Recent Posts
@MrsMarkleham on Twitter
- BREAKING NEWS: Minister declines to make any comment on judge's sentencing decision ow.ly/h5x7D. (UK Government please take note.) 4 months ago
- @deannanewstex Thanks but my blog is just a hobby. I write when I want, people read it if they want. Why complicate things? 4 months ago
- RT @AdamWagner1: More! > Eweida and Others v. UK (Part I): Taking Freedom of Religion More Seriously - Strasbourg Observers http://t. ... 4 months ago
- @flipchartrick thanks for the mention! 4 months ago
- RT @Flipchartrick #Eweida victory is a significant extension of religious rights wp.me/p3uYA-1Hs 4 months ago
- But also, "nothing more than judicial approval of a wise concession made by BA long before litigation was contemplated" ow.ly/gTbo0 4 months ago
- #Eweida: a momentous decision. A few rambling thoughts from me. #ukemplaw. ow.ly/gRF69 4 months ago
- @ariadneassoc @DazNewman @ljanstis @pcsavage *confused face* 4 months ago
Tech stuff
Category Archives: Press hyperbole
Woodcock: press reporting of employment law issues reaches a new low
It is hard to find a paragraph of the Telegraph’s report of Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust that is not hugely inaccurate, alarmist, and misleading. I should say now that the likely effect of this case on age discrimination or other areas of employment law is close to nil, and yet the Telegraph screams that the court has apparently sanctioned the sacking of older workers to save employers money “even though the practise is unlawful”. Continue reading
Posted in Age discrimination, Press hyperbole, Retirement
Tagged Discrimination, Employment Law, Telegraph, Woodcock
6 Comments
Reasonable adjustments for religion: the EHRC explains all
Commission proposes ‘reasonable accommodation’ for religion or belief is needed That’s the headline of the EHRC press release from Tuesday this week, when it announced that it was going to intervene in 4 controversial cases currently before the European Court … Continue reading
Posted in Press hyperbole, Religion, Sexual orientation
3 Comments
Capping discrimination damages? Much ado about nothing
Compensation payouts in discrimination cases have been in the news again in the last week, this time as a result of the government’s “red tape challenge” (in other words, the idea of abolishing anything that might conceivably inhibit growth). I … Continue reading
Pay “audits”: a win for Lynne Featherstone despite what anyone else says
“Coalition abandons compulsory audits of pay gap between men and women…. in a reversal of a Liberal Democrat manifesto pledge.” So claims the Guardian and numerous others, wringing their hands. But are they right? Has the Minister really abandoned her principles, six months into power? I humbly disagree. Continue reading
Posted in Discrimination, Equal pay, Equality Act, Myths, Press hyperbole, Sex discrimination
5 Comments
How likely are you to get sued for discrimination?* (Part 1)
Actually I’m not going to answer that just yet. But I am going to ask, “Why is the Equality Act getting such bad mainstream PR”? Business lobbyists such as the British Chambers of Commerce have complained that it is ill-timed and will discourage job-creation – but if anything is likely to discourage job creation and lead to mass panic among employers it is the recent spate of misleading anti-Equality Act articles in the right-wing popular press.
Continue reading
Posted in Discrimination, Equality Act, Myths, Press hyperbole
2 Comments